A procurement manager in Riyadh needs exactly what your company sells. He opens ChatGPT, asks in Arabic which companies do it, and gets three or four names back.
If your company is not among them, you will never learn the opportunity existed, because he did not visit your website, did not fill in a form, and did not call.
Here is that same question, asked twice, for a distributor we will call Mada Technology.
An illustration of the pattern these audits keep finding. Mada Technology and the companies beside it are invented. The shortlist a buyer receives depends on which language the question was asked in, and nobody inside the company ever sees either answer.
A study of close to four thousand B2B buyers last year found that in 95 percent of cases, the company that won the deal was already on the list the buyer had written before contacting anyone.1 Buyers get about two thirds of the way through a decision before they speak to a single vendor, and 94 percent of them use AI somewhere along the way.
The shortlist is written before anyone calls you.
Arabic is spoken by more than four hundred million people and makes up under one percent of the content on the web, while the UAE and Saudi Arabia have the highest rates of workplace AI use in the world. So the region asking the most questions is asking them in the language these systems know least, and the answers get assembled from whatever thin and outdated material exists.
Tawaator counts how often AI assistants name your company when the buying question is asked in Arabic, compares that against English, shows which competitors appeared in your place, and then corrects the sources those answers are built from.
We work with B2B companies selling into Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt.
Three numbers that did not exist before, each recorded before any work starts and measured again every month afterwards.
Corrections take weeks rather than days to show, because a search engine has to find and index the new pages before any assistant can read them. Nothing here is promised by a date. Everything is counted.
None of this is about a badly built website. All three failures are invisible from the inside, because every page involved renders perfectly in a browser.
By the time a buyer makes contact, the comparison is already finished and the list is already ranked.
A buying decision used to start with a phone call. It now starts with a question typed into a chat window by someone you will never meet, who describes the problem, asks which companies solve it, and gets three or four names back.
Nothing about that process is visible to a vendor. No form is filled in, no page is visited, no call is made, and no analytics system records that the opportunity existed.
In Arabic, the account a buyer receives usually comes from a directory entry nobody inside your company has read.
The assistant does not answer from memory. It runs a live search and writes its answer out of the pages that come back, and to compare several companies it needs sources that mention several companies together. That means directories and trade press rather than anyone's own website.
Arabic is spoken by over four hundred million people and makes up under one percent of the content on the web, so that third party material is thin and mostly years out of date.
Split across six names, none of them accumulates enough authority to win a comparison against a competitor using one.
Most companies here circulate under several names at once. An English trading name, a legal entity name, an abbreviation, then two or three Arabic spellings each chosen by a different person in a different decade.
Every mention of your company attaches to whichever name was used that day, and an assistant reading all six has to decide whether they describe one company or four. It decides differently on different attempts.

Nobody can edit an AI assistant. There is no console, no submission form and no appeal. What can be changed is the material it reads before it answers, and since it builds every answer out of the pages a search returns, changing those pages changes the answer.
That single fact is the whole business. Everything below follows from it.
Twenty five to forty real buying questions for your sector, written in Modern Standard Arabic, in Gulf phrasing, in Egyptian phrasing and in English. This is research into how your market actually buys rather than a translation exercise, and it is where most of the value sits.
Every question is asked twenty times in each language, across a mix of assistants, from clean sessions with no account signed in. Ask twice and you get two different answers, so a single screenshot proves nothing. The result is a count out of twenty rather than a yes or a no.
Which sources the answers were built from, how many names you circulate under across both scripts, which of your own facts contradict each other, and whether your pages can be read at all.
Arabic pages on your own domain, one canonical name in each script applied everywhere, structured data stating your facts, corrections filed with the directories and data brokers, and the technical fixes that let your pages be read.
The same questions, the same number of runs, repeated at six weeks and three months, alongside two or three named competitors who had no work done. If you rise and they hold steady, the movement came from the work.
Every engagement starts with a diagnostic, because the findings decide what is worth fixing. Prices are listed because you should be able to decide without booking a call.
An audit tells you what is happening. The build is where it gets corrected.
These are priced separately on purpose. An audit establishes what AI assistants currently say about your company, which competitors appear instead, and which sources are producing those answers. It does not include the corrective work, and most companies want to see the findings before committing to that. Monthly tracking comes after a build, never before, because there is nothing meaningful to track until something has changed.
Appearance rates move slowly and they move in both directions. A competitor publishing an Arabic site, a directory updating its records, or an assistant changing how it retrieves sources will all shift your position without anyone telling you. Tracking is what turns a one time correction into something you can defend.
The report reaches you three days before we speak. You read it, mark up whatever you want to go into, and the two hours go entirely on your questions and on deciding what to fix first.
There is no deck and no walkthrough, because reading a report aloud to the people who already have it wastes everybody's afternoon.
If you would rather not meet at all, send your questions in writing and you will have a written answer inside two working days. A good share of clients prefer this and it changes nothing about the outcome.
Three Arabic questions for your category, run against the major assistants. You get back whether your company was named, which companies were named instead, and the source the assistant leaned on hardest.
Every scan is run by hand rather than by a tool, because the programming interfaces these companies offer do not return what your buyers actually see. That takes a day and it costs nothing.
A work email on your company's own domain, please. It is how we confirm the request is yours to make.
Nothing is automated and nothing is generated. The three questions are written for your sector, the runs are counted, and the reply names the competitors that appeared in your place.
No call is required at any point. If you would rather ask questions in writing, that is the default.